Therefore, consider each inference anew and do not rely on previous answers you have given. In these questions, a quote or a short statement is presented. In most cases, even if the assumption is not explicitly stated, the speaker or provider of the information must have a couple of things he or she takes for granted or considers as necessarily true to justify the statement.
Your goal is to judge whether the suggested assumption is made by the author or not. There are only two options to choose from:. Proposed Assumption: Getting a highly paid position in a top law firm is possible. To assess whether an assumption is necessary and important, try for a moment to assume the complete opposite. The evidence must be considered as utter truth, even if it is debatable in the real world.
There are only two options to answer the question:. Some producers of renewable energy rely heavily on government subsidies. All companies that rely heavily on government subsidies will one day have to manage without them. Some producers of renewable energy will one day need to operate without government subsidies. Remember that the premises must be considered as complete truth.
In addition, remember that you cannot generalize the premises or extend their claim to areas which encompass more cases than those the premises refer to. In these questions, like the deduction questions, you also need to decide whether a proposed conclusion follows or not. To arrive at your conclusion, you must only consider the information provided in the passage, which for the purpose of the test is considered as true.
To summarize, you must choose between two options:. The activities most susceptible to automation are physical ones in highly structured and predictable environments and those involved in the collection and processing of data. Each passage is followed by two or three proposed conclusions.
These conclusions may seem related to one another. However, when you make a decision as to whether a conclusion follows or not, you should only take into account the information presented in the passage and not any conclusions that were presented before the conclusion you currently examine.
Do not let your decisions regarding previous conclusions mislead you. Each argument may either advocate in favor or against the proposed action. Either way, your goal is not to justify the arguments but to analyze them and decide whether the argument is weak or strong:.
No; some domestic jobs are created as a result of importing foreign goods. You must remember that your personal agreement with the argument is irrelevant in this case. As in many fields, such as state politics and social welfare, there might be strong arguments in favor or against almost any proposal. You may think of a proposal as the most ethical and reasonable solution, or condemn it wholeheartedly.
On the test, however, you must disregard your emotions and perceptions and refer only to the criteria for strong and weak arguments. There are many general tips on how to prepare for a test.
The following preparation strategies, however, are customized for the Watson Glaser test. Follow them, and ensure yourself a better chance of passing the test. Many people who are getting ready to take the Watson Glaser test have learned about logic and critical thinking at some time in their life.
Paradoxically, this might be a threat. The Watson Glaser test is criticized by many critical thinking professors for not being in line with common logic practices. This should not interest you one bit. In order to do well on the Watson Glaser test, you should only stick to its logic. To do that, study the specific test format and test concepts very well. Also, use a guide that is dedicated to the Watson Glaser test.
General critical thinking guides or guides that claim that they cover all the critical thinking tests, including the Watson Glaser test, will not help you do well. Finally, take Watson Glaser practice tests and learn from their solutions. Do not settle for general critical thinking practice tests. It is very difficult not to rely on your previous knowledge. The new versions of the Watson Glaser test also deal with contemporary issues about which you are already familiar and about which you may have strong opinions.
You must put all that aside. As part of its attitude towards assessing critical thinking, the WGCTA states that all the information that is provided as preliminary information for the questions arguments, statements, premises, statistics must be considered as utter truth.
Even if you are certain there are inaccuracies in it. This information is the only source from which you must glean your judgments before choosing the correct answer—not what you learned on the internet, not what your parents taught you, and not even what your moral compass is telling you. To be well-prepared for the test, you must fully understand the differences between the categories and to establish three sets of reasoning that you can apply on demand.
The question type descriptions on this page provide some insight to this, and the guides and practice questions of the course explain it well. The Watson Glaser is now a timed test, unlike most of the other critical thinking tests and the practice tests which are available online.
Overall, the time constraint 40 questions in 30 minutes is not considered severe but it adds to the general stress level and may result in careless mistakes. This is why it is important to practice using Watson Glaser tests that are timed.
Familiarizing yourself with the time pressure will reduce its adverse impact while you take the actual test. You may even gain a few time-saving tips along the way. It may also include bits of information that are meant to confuse you and make you choose incorrect answers.
However, to avoid such mistakes, there are plenty of solving techniques which can be used to solve each of the types of the Watson Glaser questions. If you choose courses that are aware of these solving techniques, and share them with you, you will find that they are invaluable in helping you earn points and save time.
The iPrep preparation course introduces such techniques to help you wisely solve each type of question. For example, it teaches you how to evaluate an assumption from contradictory perspectives to understand if it is necessary or not. It also teaches you logic that will help you manipulate the premises in the deduction questions in a way that will make it easier to evaluate the conclusions.
Even if you do not have access to a preparation guide for the Watson Glaser test, try to create your own toolbox of solving methods and repeatedly apply them to make them more intuitive for you. The newest version of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test introduces some old and some new features.
Since the introduction of Watson Glaser II, the results of the test have been reported according to a three-scale model—the RED Model of critical thinking:. Watson Glaser II is proctored and untimed. It is recommended to complete it within minutes, though, because your time is registered by the proctors. Watson Glaser III introduces a new approach—all tests are timed.
You have 30 minutes total excluding instructions that are given in between to answer 40 questions. The justification for this is that making informed decisions under time constraints is more demanding. These became so prevalent that people started sharing information about these forms online. The new, and now the most prevalent form—Watson Glaser III—no longer suffers from this problem and poses a greater challenge to the test takers. It is based on a bank of carefully selected items that are randomly pulled during the test.
The item bank is large enough to ensure that no candidate encounters the same test; yet it maintains a normalized level of difficulty. The iPrep Watson Glaser practice tests are also different from one another and make sure that you face a broad variety of items and are not surprised by the various items that may appear on the real test. Many legal firms, banks and other financial institutions use this logical thinking test as a part of their selection process for ensuring they have only the most talented people on board.
This trend was acknowledged by the Watson Glaser developers, which gradually changed the topics of the informational passages on the test from general topics to business-oriented topics. The Watson Glaser test saw some significant changes during the years, adapting it to modern conditions and its business-oriented market.
The main differences between the two versions is that Watson Glaser III is based on an item bank of questions, does not need a test proctor, and has a time limit of 30 minutes. The following table depicts the differences in detail:. The test features critical reasoning questions and is available in dozens of languages and countries around the world including the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada.
The test is identical no matter where it is administered. Watson Glaser test results are broken down into two different reports, a profile report and a development report, which are provided to the prospective employer. Some organizations may share results with test takers, especially if the test was given for developmental purposes. There is no penalty for guessing the wrong answer on the Watson Glaser test.
The profile report rates you with an overall percentile score, which is further broken down into the candidate percentile in three subscales:. While the Profile Report does include the raw number of correct answers, the percentile rank is more important. It not only factors in the number of correct answers, but the difficulty of those questions as well.
It also takes into account the norm group of the candidate, which provides different score distribution by occupation, position, and level of education. For instance, here is a sample score report for a candidate for a managerial position. It reports the overall critical thinking percentile and three subscale scores according to the RED model. It portrays an overall average candidate with a high skill of evaluating arguments, average skill of drawing conclusions, and low skill of recognizing assumptions.
However, this version of the test becomes less and less common, so you are not likely to encounter such a breakdown. Your raw score is important but it is not the deciding factor for determining whether you pass the test or not. The Watson Glaser score can be interpreted with several established norm groups — either by occupation accountant, consultant, engineer, etc. It is up to the recruiting company to decide which norm group to use when assessing your score.
Customized norms may also be created for large organizations. The development report demonstrates the strengths of their employees. Candidates with skilled behavior in the area will identify what is being taken for granted, and explore diverse viewpoints on the subject. Identifying the assumptions will help you reveal information gaps and enhance your understanding of the subject. Candidates who can objectively and accurately evaluate arguments are likely to be hired by many organizations.
When evaluating controversial arguments, emotions can play a negative role, as they can cloud your evaluation capabilities. Drawing conclusions means reaching the conclusion which logically follows the evidence available for a particular problem.
Furthermore, reaching a conclusion means evaluating information from diverse sources, and even changing your position on a subject when warranted by the available evidence. It is frequently administered as part of the hiring process, both for new hires and for existing employees looking to move up within their organization.
There are two current versions of the test. While both versions of the test measure the same type of skills, there are some differences. WG III, which is the newest version, draws its questions from a large bank of items. Since every instance of the test is different, candidates can take the test without supervision.
WG II, on the other hand, requires a proctor, and is not timed. Each company that administers the test has different standards, and may compare your score against established norm groups. Note that the scoring system takes into account the level of difficulty of each question—incorrectly answering easy questions or correctly answering difficult ones has higher significance on the final score.
Familiarizing oneself with the test through practice tests will make it easier to move through the test quickly, and the tips and tricks available through most practice test companies will help you quickly answer questions.
The most important thing you can do to pass a critical thinking test is to take a practice test beforehand. The practice test will familiarize you with the type of questions you can expect to see on the test, and help you understand what the test is measuring. The test will measure your ability to do the following: 1. Draw Inferences 2. Recognize assumptions 3. Think critically and logically interpret information 4. Draw conclusions based on given facts 5.
Evaluate arguments as weak or strong. The test is divided into 5 sections: 1. Inferences: In this section, you will be provided with a list of possible inferences which you will be asked to rate as true or false. Recognition of assumptions: In this section, you will encounter assumptions-based questions.
Deductions: You will be asked to make deductions using the information from the passage. Interpreting information: In this section, you will need to interpret information from the questions to decide if each conclusion is based on the given information or not.
Your answer should be based solely on the provided information and not on prior knowledge which may mislead you. Analyzing arguments: To examine arguments, you will have to assess whether the provided statement is strong or weak.
There will be 40 multiple choice questions that you need to complete in only 30 minutes in the timed version. Watson Glaser is a critical thinking test. Critical thinking is considered a crucial factor because candidates who possess this trait are often good decision-makers and arrive at informed, precise, and objective conclusions instantly.
Solid decision making, problem-solving skills, and strategic thinking set the foundation for a successful candidate, organizations use these to screen and hire talented people. Companies utilize the Watson Glaser test to hire strong, dedicated employees who will go on to become future leaders.
Taking Watson Glaser practice tests will help to effectively use information and make the right decision. This, in turn, will ensure passing the test. No, yet the Watson Glaser critical thinking test is a very common recruitment phase in many leading law firms, especially in the United Kingdom, even more so for recent university graduates.
Watson Glaser believes that it is essential for employee assessment to analyze and make decisions under pressure, which is why the test is timed.
In the timed version, you will only have 30 minutes to complete the test. The best way to prepare for the Watson Glaser test is with the types of questions you will find on the real test. You should use a prep course, such as iPrep, that will prepare you for the critical thinking questions that appear on the Watson Glaser test, and not on general critical thinking tests, as they differ. The best way to beat the Watson Glaser test is to prepare yourself in advance, using a similar environment to best simulate the experience.
If you are taking the timed version, make sure to time yourself so you can figure out which questions you need more time to answer and which questions you can breeze through. Many different companies and law firms use the Watson Glaser to evaluate potential employees. Answer each question solely based on the conditions and facts provided in the question, and not by using your own industry knowledge. You might encounter long questions which you may be tempted to skim through.
By quickly scanning the question, you may miss valuable information you will need to get the right answer. Read thoroughly and then make your decision. Answering each question in the Watson Glaser test requires finding a logical connection between the statements. Analyze the statements and try to find logic between them. Since there will be both long and short questions, the time spent on each question is difficult to assess in advance.
However, through practice, you should know how to manage time without skipping any question. Learn to pace and compete with time. Lastly, to ace any test, precise planning and continuous practice are a must! Therefore, practice as many questions as you can beforehand. The Watson-Glaser test is owned and published by Pearson, one of the largest educational organizations in the world.
It is part of the Pearson Talent-Lens portfolio, which focuses on pre-employment talent assessment and employee growth. The test was initially developed by Goodwin Watson and Edward Glaser.
Pearson serves , customers in the U. Disclaimer — All the information and prep materials on iPrep are genuine and were created for tutoring purposes. This course will help you boost your skills and, with it, your confidence towards your upcoming Watson Glaser test.
The course will provide you with the following tools and benefits:. By the end of this course, you will be more knowledgeable and comfortable with the Watson Glaser Test. Knowledge and familiarity with the test are the two most significant factors that can help you maximize your score and improve your chances of success. The course comprises two parts—guidance and test simulations. In the guidance section, we will review each type of question, its purpose, and its underlying logical mechanism.
You will also have a chance to practice several test-level questions before approaching the test simulation to get a feel for the challenge ahead. Afterwards, you will proceed to the simulation of full-length tests that accurately follow the structure and concepts of the Watson Glaser.
Once done, you will be able to see full question explanations and even see how well you performed in comparison with other people who have taken the test. Roy van den Brink-Budgen has been working in the field of critical thinking for over thirty years. His experience has included the development of various assessments in critical thinking, and teaching the subject to a wide range of groups students from primary to postgraduate, teachers from primary to college, juvenile offenders, and business managers.
He has also written seven books on the subject, many journal articles, and online courses for secondary students and MBA students as well as having produced a critical thinking card game. He has given presentations to various international conferences on critical thinking and creative thinking.
He serves as a consultant on critical thinking to PocketConfidant, an international company that is developing AI for personal coaching. In addition, he runs a company that provides various services in critical thinking — if…then ltd — based in the UK.
Take This Course. And the team is prepared to settle any doubts that you may have with the reasonings given behind the practice answers to the practice questions. I believe it will definitely help me. Awesome learning and testing.
I finally realized how what to look for and how to respond. I highly recommend to anyone looking to pass the test. I highly recommend investing in the iPrep course to improve your score and help get you prepared for that next position. It is one stop shopping an an efficient way to spend your time and money wisely. Good detailed and easy instructions, breakdowns and explanations that allow you to train yourself to stay within what is written.
Good Practice Tests with great explanations on the reasoning behind each answer. Learning to focus on every word and its relation to others is critical in ensuring the correct answers. Very informative content and broken down into easy to digest sections. It defiantly gave me more confidence going in to take this test! Explanations are good and are helping me think appropriately so I can get the correct answer on the practice test.
Helpful so far in preparing for the test. Very tight answers which can be argued both ways. More practice should help. Would suggest team to add couple more full length tests. Very clear instruction.
By reviewing the information you will be able to jump into the test and start answering questions versus wasting time reading instructions.
The iPrep course is helping me to prepare at my own pace and on my own time, which helps me to fit it into my busy schedule! The Question Types Guidance is quite useful because it explains the how to break down the thought processes needed to respond to the questions, and how to apply certain techniques to analyze the questions. Great prep, I improved my score. Great questions and tips to understand. The sample questions are very detailed and similar to the GFB Pearson tests.
The explanations are also very clear and detailed. Arguments are considered strong if they are related to the topic such as, "Yes, many people who would benefit from a college education do not because they cannot afford it. This hurts the country's economic growth. Compare this with a weak argument, "No, I do not trust people who read a lot of books. This is not to say that an argument against the original argument will always be a weak one, or that an argument in favour will always be a stong one.
For example, "Yes, I like people that read books," is in favour of the abolition as indicated by "yes," but that person's like or dislike of others that read books isn't related, or hasn't been explained how it's related to removing the fees. Carefully considering what is being said, remove it from your own personal opinions and political views to objectively analyse what someone else has put forward.
Deductions - A few sentences of information are presented to you. Another separate short statement will also be shown to you, which is supposed to represent a conclusion that someone has reached. You will have to determine whether this conclusion logically follows from the information given to you. If so, and without a doubt, then the conclusion follows, if not, then the conclusion does not follow. Your decision must be based on the information given and not from your own knowledge. Inferences - A short scenario is described to you, followed by possible inferences.
The inferences are short statements. Imagine that these are what people have said is inferred from the scenario. Use your judgement and the short scenario to assess whether what's being said has actually been inferred from the passage and the likelihood of this inference.
You are asked to rank each inference as either 'true,' 'false,' 'possibly true,' 'possibly false. Interpreting Information - Following a similar format to the previous four sections, a short passage of information and then a series of statements are shown to you. You are asked to judge whether the information in the passage can be interpreted as the statements suggest. The answer options are straightforward here; you either select 'conclusion follows,' or 'conclusion does not follow,' depending on whether or not you believe that the statement can be logically reached from the information given.
Again, for this section and all others, you are to base your choice of answer on what you're given, not on any speciliazed knowledge you might have. Major publishers' critical thinking tests.
This is the one that you are most likely to encounter. GMAT - The general management aptitude test, used by business schools and colleges test students' critical thinking ability. The critical thinking questions are written in a business or finance context.
Cornell - Cornell - Cornell have developed a critical thinking test to be used in educational environments. The two levels, X and Z, are aimed at children and adults, respectively. Area-specific - There are tests which focus on either numerical critical reasoning skills and verbal critical reasoning skills.
These tests will ask only numerical or only verbal questions to assess your skills in a specific area. Advice for all Critical Thinking tests. No prior knowledge - The key point here is that critical reasoning tests are measuring your ability to think, or the method that you use to reach a conclusion.
You should therefore not rely on prior knowledge to answer the question. Questions will be written so that you do not need to know any specialist knowledge to answer the question. For example, you will not be expected to know mathematical formulas or laws of nature and to answer questions with that information.
If you are given the formula and its description in the questions, you are expected to use that information to reach the answer. Carefully read the instructions - There are 5 sections to most critical thinking tests and each will assess a slightly different skill. Make sure you have read the instructions and understand what it is you are expected to do to answer the questions for this section. There is quite a difference between the Assumptions section and the Deductions section for example.
Applying the rules of one to the other would lead to just guessing the answers and making many mistakes. There is little if any 2. People in high income brackets are in a better position to avoid difference, however, in rate of heart disease between developing heart disease than people in low income brackets.
The average income of southerners in England is 3. There is a lower rate of heart disease among northerners with considerably higher than the average income of northerners. Whether northerners have high incomes or low incomes makes no difference to the likelihood of their developing heart disease. Below are a number of statements. Each statement is followed by several proposed assumptions. You are to decide for each assumption whether a person, in making the given statement, is really making that assumption i.
Remember to judge each assumption independently. Below is an example. The box at the right shows how these items should be marked on the answer sheet.
Going by plane will take less time than going by some other means of transportation. YES, it is assumed in Assumption made the statement that the greater speed of a plane over the speeds of other means of transportation will enable YES NO the group to reach its destination in less time.
There is a plane service available to us for at least part of the distance to the destination. Travel by plane is more convenient than travel by train.
NO, this assumption is not made in the statement — YES NO the statement has to do with saving time, and says nothing about convenience or about any other specific 3 mode of travel. People who have been educated in a free society will not make the individual to make wise decisions. Some education systems in our society do not have the proper aim. Some kinds of education can help individuals make wise decisions. In a society that is not free, the individual cannot make any decisions.
For the purpose of this test, consider the statements in each exercise as true without exception. Read the first conclusion beneath the statements.
Similarly, read and judge each of the other conclusions. Try not to let your prejudices influence your judgement — just stick to the given statements premises and judge whether each conclusion necessarily follows. Study the example carefully before starting the test. All rainy days are boring. No clear days are boring. NO, the conclusion does not follow.
You cannot tell from the statements Conclusion follows whether or not clear days are boring. Some may be. YES NO 2. Some holidays are boring. YES, the conclusion necessarily follows from the statements as, according 1 to them, the rainy holidays must be boring. Some holidays are not boring. NO, the conclusion does not follow, even though you may know that some holidays are very pleasant. Some difficult decisions are distasteful to some people.
Some responsible leaders dislike making difficult decisions. Irresponsible leaders avoid things they dislike.
0コメント